News · Administrative law · – July 2026

Certified notice of business start (SCIA) and tacit consent: when the authorisation becomes final and the limits of self-redress

TOPIC
Articles 19 and 20 of Law 241/1990 — consolidation of tacit authorisations and the self-redress power under Article 21-nonies.

Once the time limits for inhibitory powers have expired (sixty days, thirty in construction matters), the activity notified through a SCIA becomes final and the administration may intervene only by way of self-redress: within twelve months, on the basis of a concrete and current public interest going beyond the mere restoration of legality, and taking into account the private party’s reliance.

A false representation of the facts allows the time limit to be exceeded only if established; a third party claiming to be harmed does not challenge the SCIA directly but must urge the administration to carry out its checks and, in case of inaction, act against the silence.

IN PRACTICE
Keeping proof of the completeness and truthfulness of the notification is the best defence of the authorisation; for third parties the timeline is tight: the request must be filed as soon as the activity becomes known.

Summary note by the CommercialistiAvvocati network, based on specialised legal and practice sources. The text does not reproduce original contributions and does not constitute professional advice.

Cerca nelle guide
Scrivi una domanda e premi Invio.